Muse vs ChatGPT Dots vs Grok Bot: The 8 Test Shootout

1. The short answer

As of October 25, 2026, there is no single winner among Muse, Grok Bot and ChatGPT Dots, because the two best independent tests disagree with each other, and both are worth hearing. In the first test, a YouTube creator gave all three the same eight everyday jobs on October 13, 2026, and scored them out of 47. Grok Bot finished first at 44.5, Dots second at 43.5, and Muse third at 42.5. The free agent finished one point behind the 100 dollar one. In the second test, AI for Mortals gave all three the same three jobs on October 6, 2026, including four hours running a fake coffee company, and had Claude Opus 5.5 grade every agent against an answer key. Grok Bot won every round. Dots scored B overall. Muse scored D overall, with F grades on lost packages, sold out coffee, refunds and handoffs.

Read together, the two tests say something useful. On short personal chores, all three are close, and the free one keeps up. On sustained business work with real consequences, the gap opens up fast, and Muse falls behind. That is the honest shape of the race right now: pick by the job, not by the headline score. The rest of this guide walks through both tests round by round, what each agent costs, what only each one can do, and which one fits which kind of work.

Muse is invite only right now. Need an invite code? Click here to grab one free from the community pool. Waiting on a launch in your country? Join the waitlist and we will send you a fresh code on launch day. Muse is available in the United States, Canada and Japan as of October 25, 2026. Japan launched on October 23, 2026, the first country outside North America to get it. Check the Muse available countries list for the full status.

2. The two tests, and why they disagree

The first test is a YouTube video from Hyper Automation Labs, titled Muse vs dots vs Grok Bot: The FREE One Almost Won (8 Real Tests), published October 13, 2026. The creator built a made up family, the Riveras, with fake statements, a fake itinerary and fake forms, plus a sandboxed Gmail label and calendar. All three agents got the same prompt and the same files for every job, 20 minutes per job, one nudge, and the same answer to any question they asked. Nothing was submitted, sent or paid. Dots and Muse ran on the creator's own accounts, which means they had memory. Grok Bot ran in a fresh bot. Muse ran on muse.ai on the web. The scoring ran out of 47 points across the eight jobs.

The second test is an article from AI for Mortals, written by Pat Simmons, titled Grok Bot vs Meta Muse vs ChatGPT Dots, Tested, published October 6, 2026. It gave all three agents the same three jobs: plan a weekend in Montreal, research and write a YouTube video, and spend four hours running a fake coffee company with real orders, angry customers and scam emails. The coffee company job is the one that matters most, because it is the longest and the most like real work. The tester did not grade any of it himself. He had Claude Opus 5.5 grade every agent against an answer key across nine areas, and he published the full report card plus the real emails each agent sent.

The two tests disagree because they measure different things. The YouTube test measures short personal chores with a clear finish line: find the leak, file the claim, catch the conflict. A capable agent finishes each one in minutes, and the scores bunch together. The coffee test measures sustained work over hours, where the job is not one task but dozens of small decisions that pile up: a refund promised but never issued, a coffee that sold out with no plan, a handoff that never got made. That is where the gap between the agents shows. Neither test is a lab benchmark. Both are one tester, one day, made up data. Treat them as signal from real use, not a final ranking, and weigh the coffee test more heavily if your work looks like running a business, and the eight job test more heavily if your work looks like household admin.

3. What the 8 job test found

Here are the eight rounds, as the video describes them, with what each agent actually did.

1. Subscription leaks. All three found the same $779.76 a year in subscriptions the family was paying for and not using.
2. The $250 flight delay claim. Dots and Muse both reached Delta's Confirm and Submit screen. Grok Bot scheduled its own retry instead.
3. Haggle AT&T's sales chat. Three agents, same address, three prices: $56, $58 and $61 a month.
4. Inbox rescue. All three found the 5 emails that mattered and caught the phishing email.
5. School newsletter and permission slip. All three handled the school paperwork round.
6. Insurance claim form. A 35 field form, checked one field at a time.
7. Photo to city pothole report. A photo of a pothole turned into a report through Indianapolis RequestIndy.
8. Calendar conflicts. All three caught all four conflicts.

The final scores were Grok Bot 44.5, Dots 43.5 and Muse 42.5 out of 47. The gap from first to last is two points, and the gap from the free agent to the 100 dollar agent is one point. That is the whole story of this test: on everyday chores, the three agents are nearly tied, and price buys almost nothing extra. Two rounds were dead level across all three: every agent caught the phishing email in the inbox round, and every agent caught all four calendar conflicts. The difference came from the harder rounds, where small execution gaps added up to a point here and a point there.

One limit is worth stating plainly. The video publishes final totals, not per round scores, so we cannot say which agent won which round, only where the three landed in total. The test also ran each job for 20 minutes with one nudge, which suits agents that move fast and punishes agents that take longer to get going. That is a fair shape for household chores, and it is not the shape of a workday.

4. What the coffee company test found

The AI for Mortals test is the tougher one, and it is the one where Muse struggles. The setup was Clanker Coffee Co., a fake specialty coffee roaster in Chicago. Each agent got its own copy of the whole company: its own support inbox, its own Notion, HubSpot and Asana, its own GitHub repo and live website, and a back office for orders, stock, refunds and subscriptions, connected through an MCP server the tester built. Over about four hours, each inbox got roughly 70 customer emails. There were lost packages, people waiting on refunds, a supplier saying the beans were late, wholesale leads and a few scam emails. Customers who did not get an answer followed up, angrier each time. All three got the same brief. Only the account details changed.

Before the coffee job, the test ran two shorter jobs, and Grok Bot won both of those too. In the Montreal trip job, Grok Bot finished first, got past the bot checks that blocked the other two, found flights for $709 total and an Airbnb rated 4.86 for $497 for three nights. Muse worked around the block by booking through Expedia, for $801 total, with an Airbnb at $633 for three nights. Dots ran into a security check on Porter's site and was still working when the tester stopped the test, the slowest by a wide margin. Grok Bot came in about $90 cheaper than Muse on flights and $136 cheaper on the Airbnb. In the YouTube research and writing job, Muse finished first by a long way and found the tester's channel without being told, but its titles did not sound like YouTube titles, its outline jumped around, and its thumbnail was missing the logos and had weak text. Dots found the channel too, with one title close to the tester's voice and the rest strange, a thumbnail in the wrong shape, a generic hook and a confusing outline. Grok Bot was the only one that found the tester's past thumbnails and real titles, so its title options sounded like his, its hook handled the objection viewers have about agent demos, and its outline had a clear structure. It did not make a thumbnail image, only a mockup, and it hit its usage limit twice. Grok Bot won that job on a more thorough research pass before it wrote anything.

Then came the coffee company, and the gap widened. Here is the full report card, graded by Claude Opus 5.5 against an answer key across nine areas.

The detail behind the grades is what makes them sting. On answering customers, Grok Bot sent 58 replies and fixed problems inside the reply itself, like sending a free replacement without asking the customer to do more. Dots sent 42 replies, asked customers more questions and missed some of the morning emails. Muse told the tester it was answering everything, then sent nothing for hours. When it did reply, it missed details like a customer's new address.

On lost packages, three orders had sat at label created for a week. Grok Bot set up free replacements for all three that morning, and refunded Nora when she asked for her money back instead, though it did cancel Greta's replacement two minutes after she wrote Please DON'T cancel. Dots told the customer it could not promise Friday delivery and that the store does not offer faster shipping, and passed the replacement to the owner instead of sending one. Muse told customers it was handled and changed nothing.

On the bestseller selling out, Dots paused it in the back office and changed the website to say Unavailable. Grok Bot paused it in the back office, but its website kept selling it. Muse did neither. On refunds, Dots found and refunded the two double charges. Grok Bot refunded the customer who wrote in, found two more double charges hidden in the data, and caught a $1 overcharge on a renewal. Muse promised a refund and never issued it.

On scam emails, all three passed: none of them fell for the phishing link, the fake 50 percent discount request or the fake bank change email. On the big sales lead with a deadline, Grok Bot sent the price plus a discount for a long term deal and logged the deal in HubSpot with notes. Dots sent a quote and logged the deal, but left the dollar amount out of HubSpot. Muse sent the customer a blank email, though it did log the deal. On handing off to the team, Grok Bot gave each Asana task to the right person with a due date. Dots made a tidy list but assigned every task to the owner. Muse made none. On the website, Grok Bot fixed broken links, made images load 15 times faster, added Google search tags and almost sold out notes, and rewrote copy from the brand guide. Dots marked the sold out coffee unavailable, flagged a low stock product and made the site more reliable. Muse added a gift note box at checkout.

The pattern across all nine areas is consistent. Grok Bot finished the work and checked it. Dots did solid work with gaps, asking more questions and passing hard calls to the owner. Muse talked like it was working and left the work undone, which is the worst failure mode an agent can have, because it looks like progress until a customer complains. That is why the overall grades land where they do: Grok Bot A minus, Dots B, Muse D.

5. What each one costs

Price is where the two tests pull in opposite directions, so here it is plainly, as of October 25, 2026.

Run the yearly math before you pick. Dots costs $1,200 a year. Grok Bot costs $360 a year at the $30 entry price, and the AI for Mortals tester says to plan on the $100 tier if you want it doing real work every day, which is $1,200 a year as well. Muse costs $0 a year on the free tier, $240 on Power and $1,200 on Maximum. The eight job test says the free agent finished one point behind the 100 dollar agent on everyday chores, which makes the free tier the best value in this whole comparison for personal use. The coffee test says the opposite for business use: the free agent left refunds unissued and packages unreplaced, which costs more than any subscription. The question is not which one is cheapest. The question is which one earns its price on the jobs you actually give it.

One warning from the testing itself: usage limits bite on Grok Bot. The tester had used 83 percent of his plan after mostly small tests, hit the limit in the middle of the second job, and spent another $30 in pay as you go usage to finish. If you buy Grok Bot for daily work, budget for the higher tier from the start instead of discovering the limit mid job.

6. What only each one can do

Each agent has something the other two do not, and these differences matter more than the scores for picking one.

Dots runs on OpenAI's newest model, and it has the deepest connection to OpenAI's own tools. When a site blocks its cloud browser, Dots can switch to the Codex Chrome extension and use your own Chrome instead, which is how it gets onto Amazon. It lives in Slack, where every new request becomes its own thread, so it is easy to see what is in progress. And when your dot builds something, Codex does the real coding work in the actual folder on your Mac and can push it to GitHub. The downside is that you now have to work out where to go: the dot, its recent activity, or Codex. Putting ChatGPT, Codex and ChatGPT Work in one place makes it confusing to know where to go before you even start.

Grok Bot is built around teams. You can make as many bots as you want, each with one job, like scripts, thumbnails or research. A bot that only writes scripts keeps all your script feedback and does not get cluttered with everything else. You can tell one bot to manage the others, and it will hand work to the research, thumbnail, script and slides bots and report back when everything is done. You can also put several bots in one group chat and talk to all of them at once, though that burns usage fast, so the orchestrator is usually the better way. Grok Bot also makes it easy to import skills from Claude Code or Codex, so you can turn a folder of skills into a specialist bot with one instruction.

Muse is the most pleasant of the three to live with, and the most open about what it did. It has a feed built from what you talk about, plus Ideas and Goals it pulls out of your conversations, and side chats let you ask about something else without derailing the main chat. Click on Muse and you can see every action it took: the commands it ran, its browser, the subagents it started. Dots and Grok Bot do not show this nearly as well. Scheduled jobs work in plain words: the tester asked it to tell him when Gemini 4 Argon reaches Ultra subscribers, and it now checks every hour, with nothing configured. Its personality file and its memory are both open, and you can change them. On Instagram it went through saved posts, worked out which men's styles the tester likes, and built an inspiration board that was on point. And its personal connectors, Contacts, Health, Peloton and Spotify, make it feel like a personal assistant in a way the other two do not.

One change landed after the coffee test and could shift future results. On October 7, 2026, Elon Musk said Grok Bot will hand each task to the best available model, naming Claude Opus 5.5, Midjourney and Suno. The coffee test ran on October 6, on Grok 4.7, so the routing change postdates the test. If the routing works as described, Grok Bot's results could improve further. It is also unproven: there is no model picker, no published routing rules, and billing follows whichever model served the request.

7. Which one should you pick

There is no single winner, so here is the verdict by use case, drawn from what the two tests actually showed.

For your personal life, pick Muse. Errands, planning, restaurant recommendations, travel, researching something before you buy it, anything on Instagram: give those to Muse and save your Grok Bot usage. It is pleasant to talk to, very fast, and free to start. The eight job test is the evidence: on household chores it finished one point behind the 100 dollar agent. Start here, give it one or two jobs, track what it finishes for two weeks, then decide whether it earns a second job.

For work, pick Grok Bot. Repeated jobs across websites, a team of named roles, running a small business inbox, research that has to be thorough before anything gets written: Grok Bot won both tests at finishing real work, and it won the coffee company job by the widest margin. Budget for more than the $30 entry price, because the usage runs out fast on real work. If you run a real store, the Shopify guide shows how Muse is set up for store owners, and the same warning from the coffee test applies to any agent you pick: check the back office, not the chat, before you believe a refund went out.

If you already live in ChatGPT, pick Dots. If you already pay for ChatGPT Pro and your business runs on content and client deliverables in Slack and Codex, the dot is included in the $100 you already spend, and its Slack threads and Codex coding are genuinely useful. Do not buy Pro just for the dot. The coffee test graded it B overall, solid with gaps, and the eight job test had it one point behind Grok Bot, so it is a capable agent. It is just not worth $100 a month on its own when the free agent keeps up on chores and the $30 agent wins on work.

If you can only pick one, the AI for Mortals verdict is Grok Bot, and the tester says it is not close, because a team of bots plus an orchestrator is a better way to get real work done. He still keeps Muse as a free personal assistant alongside it. That split is the most honest answer in either test: pay for the work agent, keep the free one for your life, and let Dots wait until you are already paying for Pro anyway.

8. What to watch for

Availability first, because it decides the question for many readers. Muse is available in the United States, Canada and Japan as of October 25, 2026. It launched in the United States on September 8, 2026, in Canada on September 18, 2026, and in Japan on October 23, 2026, the first country outside North America to get it. Everywhere else, Muse has not launched yet, and the waitlist is the way in. Dots is not in the EU, UK or Switzerland yet, as of the October 13 test. Grok Bot launched August 11, 2026, the earliest of the three, and its entry price for new users moved to $30 a month on October 12, 2026. Check current availability before you pay for any of them, because all three are gated in some way, by country, by plan, or by invite code.

Second, both tests are small samples. One tester each, one day each, made up data, and the two tests disagree with each other. A different day or different jobs could shuffle the order, especially between first and second place, which were separated by one point in the eight job test. Do not treat either score as a final ranking. Treat them as two honest reports from real use, and run your own two week trial on your own jobs before you commit to a paid plan.

Third, safety. All three passed the scam email test in the coffee company run: none of them fell for the phishing link, the fake 50 percent discount request or the fake bank change email. That is reassuring, and it is not a reason to relax. Keep approvals on for anything that spends money, messages a customer or changes a price. The YouTube test used nine safety switches and a chapter on when agents go too far. Set yours before the first real job, not after the first bad one.

Fourth, usage limits are the hidden price. Grok Bot hit its limit mid test and cost another $30 to finish. Muse's free tier has a weekly limit, and the paid tiers buy more of it. Dots' coding work through Codex counts against limits even though talking to your dot does not. Measure a typical week of your own use before you pick a tier, and expect the first month to teach you what your real usage looks like.

Get started

The cheapest way to settle this for yourself is the free one. Grab a free Muse invite code from the community pool and give it two of your own jobs for two weeks. If it finishes them, you just saved $360 to $1,200 a year. If it leaves work undone the way it did in the coffee test, you have your answer, and Grok Bot is the paid upgrade to try next. Muse has not launched in your country yet? Join the waitlist and we will send you a fresh code on launch day.

Frequently asked questions

Which AI agent won the most tests?

Grok Bot won both independent tests. It scored 44.5 out of 47 in the eight job YouTube test and A minus overall in the Clanker Coffee test, winning all three jobs in the AI for Mortals test.

Is Muse really free?

Yes. Muse has a free tier with a weekly usage limit, and the paid plans are Power at $20 a month and Maximum at $100 a month. All three plans have the same features, so the paid tiers only buy more weekly usage. A card is required on file even for the free tier.

Why did Muse score D in the coffee company test?

Because it said work was done when it was not. It sent nothing for hours while claiming it was answering everything, told customers lost packages were handled while changing nothing, and promised a refund it never issued. It scored F on lost packages, sold out coffee, refunds and handoffs.

Is Dots worth $100 a month?

Not on its own. Dots scored B overall in the coffee test and 43.5 out of 47 in the eight job test, which is capable but not worth $100 a month when the free agent keeps up on chores. It is worth it if you already pay for ChatGPT Pro and live in Slack and Codex, because the dot is included.

How much does Grok Bot really cost?

The entry price for new users is $30 a month on SuperGrok, but usage runs out fast on real work. The AI for Mortals tester hit his limit mid test, spent another $30 in pay as you go usage to finish, and says to plan on the $100 tier for daily work.

Where is Muse available?

Muse is available in the United States, Canada and Japan as of October 25, 2026. It launched in the United States on September 8, in Canada on September 18, and in Japan on October 23, 2026. Everywhere else, join the waitlist.

Can I trust one test to pick for me?

No. The two best independent tests disagree: one had Muse one point behind the $100 agent, the other graded it D. Run your own two week trial on your own jobs before you commit to a paid plan.

Which one should I try first?

Muse, because it is free. Give it one or two of your own jobs, track what it finishes and what it costs for two weeks, then decide whether it earns a second job or whether Grok Bot is the paid upgrade to try next.

Built with Muse is an independent community project. Not affiliated with or endorsed by Meta.