Steps
- List the ingredients you already have and paste the first prompt into Muse. Include the meal count, desired preparation time and maximum extra ingredients.
- Read the table and shopping list. If the first answer exceeds your ingredient limit, paste the follow-up and name the only extra ingredients you want it to use.
The result
Muse produced a three-day breakfast table and a shopping list. Its first answer exceeded my limit of three extra ingredients, so I asked again with soy sauce, cooking oil and salt as the only extras. The revised table used those three: cabbage-and-egg fried rice, tofu/cabbage/egg scramble with rice, and a cabbage omelette with rice. I checked the generated plan, but did not cook or time the recipes. The useful part was turning ingredients into a concrete plan and correcting it with a follow-up.
If you are joining Muse, my referral code is 5TLLWD. Join at https://muse.ai/join and redeem the code in Settings within 48 hours of joining. For an eligible redemption, both you and I receive 1 billion Muse tokens. This is a referral benefit for both of us.
Questions about this workflow
What does this workflow do?
Turn eggs, tofu, cabbage and rice into a three-day breakfast plan; tighten the shopping list with one follow-up.
What prompt does this workflow use?
First prompt (Korean): Muse 활용 예시: 달걀, 두부, 양배추, 밥이 있을 때 만들 수 있는 3일 아침 메뉴를 짜줘. 각 메뉴는 10분 안에 만들고, 추가 재료는 최대 3개만. 날짜·메뉴·만드는 순서를 짧은 표로 정리하고 마지막에 장보기 목록을 적어줘. 250자 안팎으로 답해줘. Follow-up (Korean): 추가 재료가 3개를 넘었어. 간장·식용유·소금만 추가해서 다시 짜줘. 장보기 목록도 그 3개만 적어줘. 표의 조리 순서는 한 줄씩 짧게 부탁해.
How do I use this workflow?
Copy the prompt from this page into Muse and adjust the details to your situation. The result above is what the author got. Every workflow here is free to use; you just need access to Muse, and if you do not have an invite yet you can claim a community code on the homepage.
Report this workflow
Be one of the first to post your Muse workflow here. Add your own and become the person people follow.
Discussion
No comments yet
Sign in to join the discussion